Well, it’s possible that we don’t know what has happened (or not happened) in the Prince William, Rose Hanbury, a psychiatrist in Beverly Hills, and dr. Carol Lieberman, gave to Louise Swift of an idea of what you could have made a big fuss of the situation.
Lieberman explains, “The one that seems most likely what has happened is that the Rose is made of a piece of theatre to William when Kate was pregnant”, that is, a point at which “[h]The bands are usually very vulnerable. Why, you ask? Lieberman said that” generally speaking, there is less of the sex, for fear of harming the baby in the womb, and the husband looks at his pregnant wife as a ‘mother’, and, as a result,” it is still the taboo of a man who has sexual relations with his own mother.”
However, Lieberman says that “William, you would have realized, before we go too far, that her version of a lesser quality than Her not-so-pretty and elegant, not-so-well-reasoned, or is not a stellar character, not-so-fun and not-so-loving mother or a wife.” For this reason, in the future, people would have not changed the water for the Rose.
As for the Rose, Lieberman feels that he is “less satisfied with their marriage because of the age difference,” David, who were born in the 1960’s, is a 24-year-old Rose, who was born in 1984, and because you are all alone, her husband was away so often.”
Although this gives the observer the actual too much to think about it, it’s not all that Lieberman has noted, the root of this controversy, of making a mistake.
